No, you do not have to have a boutonniere. This is only traditional, and it’s a tradition that has been going on for many, many years. But I’m actually kind of sick of this tradition, to be honest with you. And the reason why is because when the guys put on these boutonnieres, they don’t mean it, but they are so not careful. And when they are put on before ceremony, oftentimes they are already broken or the flower is dead. And it’s just such a pain in the ass when this happens, because you want it to be pretty and perfect and look good for photos. But a lot of times they’re already ruined before ceremony starts. And they’re not cheap. They’re at least $15 to $25 each. So if you want to save cost, just take out the boutonnieres. I don’t think anyone’s going to miss them. In fact, I think the guys would really appreciate not having to wear a boutonniere or pinholes through the suits that they probably bought for so much money. I actually think that if it’s a black tie affair and you’re wearing this black tie, expensive suit, that you don’t put nothing on it. Just leave it clean and simple and with no boutonniere. So, no, you do not have to have a boutonniere.
To be honest, I don’t think that boutonniers really allow the groom to stand apart. So I’m not personally a big fan of them but I do think there’s ways to elevate the grooms. If you are going to have boutonnieres for everybody, you could do a pocket square boutonniere which actually just sits on cardboard inside their pocket and it becomes more of a horizontal boutonnier. I think it’s really stunning. Also lapel boutonnieres are really in style and I think those are great as well. But long answer short no, you do not need boutonnieres at all. It’s just an added cost. Typically twenty dollars to forty dollars depending on what kind of flowers and how big. I just don’t think it’s something that’s important or necessary. The guys are going to take their jackets off as soon as ceremony is over so it’s really just for those photos. And I don’t think there’s ever been a moment that I look at a ceremony photo and think wow, those boutonnieres just really stand out. You guys should be the focal point anyway. So if you want to have your groom in one just because he is the groom, I think that’s a really great option. Or anyone that is in a pantsuit and has a lapel, I think there’s some really stunning lapel accessories you can do now. So no, you don’t need one. But there’s a lot of all alternatives. So it’s not just the standard kind of one flower bouveneer.
If you’re thinking about opting out of Boutonnieres, I’m here to support you 1000% because they are, in my opinion, an incredible waste of money. Did it look great in pictures? Yeah. Do your pictures look any less great if some of the people in them aren’t wearing flowers on their lapel? No. So save yourself some money and save yourself the grief. Because when you wear a bootonier, you’re like half hugging people because you’re afraid you’re going to break the flower. It so much and it’s so unnecessary. That’s my opinion. So if you’re a pro Botanir, please don’t come for me.
Here are some tips and tricks to film a great video that stops the scroll:
You’ve got 3-5 seconds to stop the viewer’s scroll. Be creative… start with a phrase like:
We’ll put your name and bio in the title and links, so you can say something more general like:
Give them your hot take, and don’t hold anything back.
check out how Sal nailed it in this video and so did Megan in this one and Nichole told it straight (from her car).
Do you feel like the industry charges more “because it’s a wedding” and they know it’s an emotional purchase?
Do companies think that they can charge more for weddings since the bride and groom may be willing to spend more on their dream wedding?
Hey wedding pros – is this higher price tag justified? Why? Do you charge more for your service if it is a wedding?
This is a taboo topic, whispered but not discussed… until now.
Welcome to The Uncorked Project!
2 comments
I have been asked this so many times... does the wedding industry inflate prices when they hear it's a wedding?
Here is my honest answer (as a former wedding photographer)... NO. Did I charge more for a wedding than a 50th birthday party or a family portrait session? Yes, absolutely. I charged A LOT more for a wedding.
Was I taking advantage of the emotional sell? Absolutely not.
The main reasons I charged more for a wedding were: the unseen amount of work involved in the 12+ months leading up to the wedding, the skill level needed on the day, the INTENSE pressure to create perfect "portfolio level work" no matter what the reality of the situation- but mostly it is to compensate for the time AFTER the wedding in post production.
Little known fact about wedding photography - the real job is sitting at a computer editing photos. Photographers spend many hours behind the computer carefully selecting and editing photos. They make adjustments, crop, and adjust colors to ensure each image it's best. Don't forget the time it takes for batching, renaming, importing, exporting and uploading the photos and preparing them for delivery.
Do you think this justifies why photographers charge more for weddings than for other types of shoots?
Couldn’t agree more! And on the videography side its an absolute ton of data + editing discipline.
Its a double sided coin- weddings are extremely high pressure but also high reward when we nail it.
Our products (photo video) in particular are the only thing that genuinely will last forever . Having fun and ALSO nailing the product is worth the price of entry and frankly more.